Are the tools used to gather the data set up right? So far 84% of them are not.
If the data is unreliable, that means what is fed into the equations will result in incorrect numbers. But are the equations correct? There are some who would say the equations are off.
With inaccurate data and suspect equations, what good are computer models of projected weather patterns when those models can’t agree with recorded data used to test the validity of the model?
Part of global warming requires the oceans of the Earth to be warming up. What happens when the data shows they are not?
Is there information found in scientific journals that throw this global warming panic upside down? Yes, there are many of them covering how CO2 has little to no effect, how the primary climate change sources are the sun first then volcanic activity both above water and in the oceans.
Are these scientists silent in their stances or are they lining up to sign on in opposition to the claims? The latter is true.
Are the Polar Regions really warming up? Or do we need to focus on the bigger picture and not just a time frame in our short lives?
Has the last ten years really been that warm? Warming stopped in 1998 and when the data is corrected, the warmest year on record is back in the 1930’s. The past year does not make a trend but the totality of the data is compelling.
Remember the poor dying populations of polar bears? That has been debunked as a false statement or selective calculations at best.
Now what about the CO2? I stand corrected it is technically a greenhouse gas. However, the data and logic point the primary culprit to be the sun. What impact do humans have on CO2 emissions according to the data?
The answer to the last question can be summarized. “Greenhouse” gases account for between 1-2% of the atmosphere with the vast majority of it being water vapor. The small portion that is CO2 comes predominantly from nature. What impact do humans have on the greenhouse effect? The entire human race on this planet accounts for ¼ of 1 percent of the greenhouse effect.
How much of that minute portion is produced by the USA? Since China and India out produces us in not only manufacturing but definitely in their quantity of people, the USA lags behind quite far.
So can the EPA solve it all at the behest of attorney generals and Presidential candidates? A gnat has a better chance of killing an elephant by kicking it in the toenail than anything we can do. Legislation can do nothing to stop the sun and the Earth. The climate changes, deal with it. To think we are so important as to trump the entire complex and not fully understood cycles on earth and in the solar system is utter folly.
To begin to think a highly complex of global weather climate and the variety of causes and effects along with solar impact can be addressed in 30 second ad spots begs of a strong need for some to be committed to a psychiatric wing in a hospital. Or as proposed by John Coleman, the founder of the Weather Channel, it is high time to sue these quacks and hucksters for fraud.
Perhaps we can submit a suggestion to the lawyers, politicians, actors, actresses and TV station owners. They can help control CO2 emissions by holding their breath. Heaven knows the USA and the world would be better off with all that hot air.
0 comments
Post a Comment